Case 4100413/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Kenneth Madden v Represented by His wife, Lynne Madden Fenton Bespoke — 2021
- Case reference
- 4100413/2021
- Decision date
- 13 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge King
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Kenneth Madden
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Kenneth Madden worked for Fenton Bespoke as a joiner from 12 October 2020 to 27 November 2020 on £17 per hour, with a gross weekly rate of £714. Before the merits hearing, he applied to amend his claim to add unpaid holiday pay. The tribunal allowed the amendment, applying Cocking v Sandhurst (Stationers) Limited and Selkent Bus Company Limited (trading as Stagecoach Selkent) v Moore, because the holiday pay issue was closely related to the original claim, had been raised promptly, was not time-barred, and the claimant had initially been unaware of the entitlement because no contract had been issued.
On the fuel costs issue, the tribunal accepted that there had been a verbal agreement with Paul Gallagher that if the claimant had to buy fuel for company business without cash in advance, he would be reimbursed on production of valid receipts. It found that the claimant bought fuel on 17 November 2020 and 23 November 2020, each time incurring £40, and that he produced receipts but was not reimbursed. The tribunal therefore ordered repayment of £80.
On salary, the tribunal found that the claimant had worked 39 hours during the week 23 to 27 November 2020 and should have been paid £663 gross. It accepted that the respondent withheld payment because of damage to a third-party vehicle, but found no statutory provision, relevant contractual term, or written consent authorising any deduction. It held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages in breach of section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal also found that the claimant had accrued 3.7 days' holiday, had taken none, and had not been paid on termination, so he was entitled to £528.36 gross in lieu under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. The total award was £1,271.36 gross, and the tribunal stated the claimant would be liable to HMRC for tax and national insurance on the award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim for reimbursement of fuel costs incurred for the company vehicle. The tribunal accepted a verbal agreement that fuel bought without cash advance would be reimbursed on production of valid receipts, and found two unreimbursed £40 items. | Upheld | — | £80 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unpaid salary for 23 to 27 November 2020. The tribunal found the respondent withheld wages because of vehicle damage, but there was no statutory or contractual basis for the deduction and no written consent. | Upheld | — | £663 |
| Holiday pay | Claim for accrued holiday pay added by amendment. The tribunal found the claimant accrued 3.7 days' holiday over 7 weeks, took none, and was entitled to payment in lieu on termination under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | £528 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,271
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- Cocking v Sandhurst (Stationers) Limited
- Selkent Bus Company Limited (trading as Stagecoach Selkent) v Moore
- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.