Case 4100417/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms D Slavkova v 15 Forza Glasgow Limited — 2018
- Case reference
- 4100417/2018
- Decision date
- 5 April 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Whitcombe
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms D Slavkova
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs D Slavkova was found to have been an employee of Forza Glasgow Limited at all relevant times. By consent, Mr M Onorati was found not to have been the Claimant’s employer and was dismissed from the proceedings. The tribunal gave oral reasons at the hearing and no written reasons were requested.
The claim for notice pay as damages for breach of contract was dismissed on withdrawal. The remaining monetary claims succeeded: the tribunal found unlawful deductions from wages of £393.30 gross and ordered the First Respondent to pay that amount to the Claimant.
The tribunal also found that the Claimant was entitled to £86.94 gross in respect of accrued but untaken paid annual leave, and ordered payment of that sum. The judgment records no separate award of compensation, interest, or other remedy beyond those two gross sums.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The claim for notice pay as damages for breach of contract was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unlawful deductions from wages of £393.30 gross and ordered the First Respondent to pay that sum. | Upheld | — | £393 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the Claimant was entitled to £86.94 gross for accrued but untaken paid annual leave and ordered the First Respondent to pay that sum. | Upheld | — | £87 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £480
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.