Case 4100422/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Gavin v Open Learning College Ltd — 2017
- Case reference
- 4100422/2017
- Decision date
- 5 May 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Jane Garvie
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Gavin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was issued under rule 21 because no response had been presented to the claim. On the available material, Employment Judge F Jane Garvie determined that Miss N Gavin had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, and awarded damages of £2,130.84 based on weekly net pay of £236.76 and monthly net pay of £1,026.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,067.68, calculated from gross weekly pay of £258.46 and gross monthly pay of £1,120. It further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £520.
In addition, the respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £160, being the issue fee paid by the claimant. The hearing listed for 24 May 2017 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim succeeded on notice pay. The judgment awards damages of £2,130.84 calculated from weekly net pay of £236.76 and monthly net pay of £1,026. | Upheld | — | £2,131 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,067.68, calculated from gross weekly pay of £258.46 and gross monthly pay of £1,120. | Upheld | — | £2,068 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £520. | Upheld | — | £520 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,879
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.