Case 4100429/2021 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4100429/2021 Mr M Branco v Hillcrest Finance Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 4100429/2021
- Decision date
- 18 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4100429/2021 Mr M Branco
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, so the Employment Judge issued judgment on the available material under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £3,666.00. The judgment does not record any separate breakdown of that sum into different remedy components, and it does not identify any further issues beyond the unlawful deduction from wages claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment: no response was presented; the Employment Judge decided the claim on the available material and found an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £3,666 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,666
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.