Case 4100442/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100442/2022 Mr A Mooney v Rest Eazy Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 4100442/2022
- Decision date
- 27 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Gall Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100442/2022 Mr A Mooney
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment on the papers after no response was presented by the respondent. On the available material, Employment Judge R Gall found that Rest Eazy Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £721.14 gross.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. It awarded £397.38, described in the judgment as one week's pay net.
In addition, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered £120.19 gross, described as one day's leave at a rate of £120.19 per day. The hearing listed for 8 June 2022 was cancelled, and the total monetary award was £1,238.71.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £721.14 gross. | Upheld | — | £721 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £397.38, described as one week's pay net. | Upheld | — | £397 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered £120.19 gross, described as one day's leave at a rate of £120.19 per day. | Upheld | — | £120 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,239
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.