Case 4100483/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100483/2019, 4100484/2019, 4100704/2019 and 4100705/2019 Miss L Rutherford v Christine Clark — 2019
- Case reference
- 4100483/2019
- Decision date
- 17 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100483/2019, 4100484/2019, 4100704/2019 and 4100705/2019 Miss L Rutherford
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment on the available material after the respondent stated that no part of the claim was contested. The tribunal recorded that the claimant, Miss L Rutherford, had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £280. That figure was calculated by reference to her age of 27, length of service of 2 years, and weekly wage of £140 at the date her employment ended.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £140 for one week of leave accrued but not taken at the date of termination. The listed hearing on 17 April 2019 was cancelled. No other substantive claims or remedies were determined in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Rule 21 judgment: the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was awarded a redundancy payment calculated by reference to age 27, two years' service and a weekly wage of £140. | Upheld | — | £280 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment: the respondent failed to pay holiday entitlement and was ordered to pay £140 for one week of leave accrued but not taken at termination. | Upheld | — | £140 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £420
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.