Case 4100506/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P McGregor v The Pine Warehouse Ltd t/a Furniture Mountain — 2018
- Case reference
- 4100506/2018
- Decision date
- 20 April 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shona MacLean
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P McGregor
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Shona MacLean issued judgment under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 in favour of Mr P McGregor against The Pine Warehouse Ltd t/a Furniture Mountain. The tribunal recorded that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £2,120, calculated as four weeks at £530 gross wages.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,934, expressed as six weeks' pay capped at £489 per week. It further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £2,053.60, calculated as 27.2 days at £75.5 per day.
The listed hearing on 20 April 2018 was cancelled. The judgment does not record any disputed evidence or additional reasoning beyond the Rule 21 findings and the stated monetary calculations.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages awarded at £2,120, being 4 x £530 gross wages. | Upheld | — | £2,120 |
| Redundancy | Claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was awarded a redundancy payment of £2,934, described as 6 weeks' pay capped at £489 per week. | Upheld | — | £2,934 |
| Holiday pay | Respondent failed to pay holiday entitlement; award made for £2,053.60, calculated as 27.2 days at £75.5 per day. | Upheld | — | £2,054 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,108
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.