Case 4100508/2017 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100508/2017 Miss S Cameron v Fastnet Highlands Limited — 2017
- Case reference
- 4100508/2017
- Decision date
- 26 May 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge G. Ian McPherson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100508/2017 Miss S Cameron
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short Scottish Employment Tribunal judgment in Miss S Cameron v Fastnet Highlands Limited, issued by Employment Judge G. Ian McPherson on 26 May 2017. The extracted text does not set out any factual findings on the merits of the underlying dispute.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant had withdrawn the claim. It therefore dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
No monetary award was made, and the extracted text does not identify any panel members or any substantive legal test applied to the merits of the case.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive nature of the claim in the extracted text. It records that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.