Case 4100511/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100511/2018 Mr J Cameron v Datalytics Technology (in liquidation) — 2019
- Case reference
- 4100511/2018
- Decision date
- 16 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laura Doherty
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100511/2018 Mr J Cameron
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 39(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the basis that it had not been actively pursued.
The respondent company was in compulsory liquidation. The claimant had been notified on 8 August 2018 of the need to obtain court consent for the proceedings to be instituted or continued as required by the Insolvency Act 1986, but no such consent had been obtained.
On 26 June 2019, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The deadline of 3 July 2019 passed without a response or acceptable reason, so the claim was struck out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying claim type in the extracted text; it states only that the claim was struck out for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 39(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Insolvency Act 1986
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.