Case 4100524/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Number: 4100524/2025 Mr B Elsdon v Roxburghe Handknits Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 4100524/2025
- Decision date
- 5 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Macleod Case
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Number: 4100524/2025 Mr B Elsdon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent stated that no part of the claim was contested. Employment Judge Macleod therefore issued judgment under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the available material. The judgment records that the claimant, Mr B Elsdon, succeeded on all matters decided in the case.
The tribunal held that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £5,813.64 net. It also found that he was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £11,407.50. In addition, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £205.43 net.
The total of the sums ordered is £17,426.57. The judgment does not record any separate award of interest or any other component beyond the three amounts listed above.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered payment of damages in the net sum of £5,813.64. | Upheld | — | £5,814 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and held that he was entitled to a redundancy payment of £11,407.50. | Upheld | — | £11,408 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the net sum of £205.43. | Upheld | — | £205 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £17,427
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.