Claimant v 15:17 Ltd — 2020

Case reference: 4100537/2020
Decision date: 30 September 2020
Jurisdiction: Scotland
Judge: Employment Judge R McPherson

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Respondent

15:17 Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The case, Mrs Arlene Bovill v 15:17 Ltd, was heard via Cloud Video Platform on 18 September 2020 before Employment Judge R McPherson. The extracted judgment records that all of the claimant's claims were dismissed.

The judgment does not set out the underlying factual findings or any separate reasoning for individual claims in the extracted text supplied here. It also records that oral reasons were given at the final hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of sending the judgment.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Breach of contract	The judgment states that all of the claimant's claims were dismissed, but it does not set out the individual claims in the extracted text.	Dismissed	—	—
Unlawful deduction from wages	The judgment states that all of the claimant's claims were dismissed, but it does not set out the individual claims in the extracted text.	Dismissed	—	—
Working time regulations	The judgment states that all of the claimant's claims were dismissed, but it does not set out the individual claims in the extracted text.	Dismissed	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.