Case 4100537/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100537/2022 Mr M Conway v Home Restore Scotland Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 4100537/2022
- Decision date
- 30 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge P O'Donnell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100537/2022 Mr M Conway
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 judgment issued because no response had been presented to the claim. The Employment Judge decided the case on the available material without a hearing and made findings on three pay-related claims brought by Mr M Conway against Home Restore Scotland Ltd.
The tribunal upheld the claim for unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered the respondent to pay £4,038.30 gross, calculated as 42 days at £96.15. It also upheld the breach of contract claim in respect of notice, finding that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract and awarding £375.92 net, described as one week at that rate.
The tribunal further upheld the claim for unpaid holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £999.96 gross, calculated as 10.4 days at £96.15. The total monetary award recorded by the judgment is £5,414.18.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages and was ordered to pay the gross sum of £4,038.30, calculated as 42 days at £96.15. | Upheld | — | £4,038 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages in the net sum of £375.92, described as one week at £375.92. | Upheld | — | £376 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum of £999.96, calculated as 10.4 days at £96.15. | Upheld | — | £1,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,414
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.