Case 4100538/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100538/2024 Ms A Philips v Liweo Group Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 4100538/2024
- Decision date
- 2 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge P O’Donnell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100538/2024 Ms A Philips
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 judgment issued on the available material because no response was presented to the claim. The tribunal therefore determined the claims without any respondent participation.
The Employment Judge found that Liweo Group Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Ms A Philips's wages and ordered the respondent to pay £1,947.00. The tribunal also found that Ms Philips was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered the respondent to pay damages in the net sum of £990.00.
The judgment does not break the award down further, but the combined monetary figure from the two orders is £2,937.00.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; no response was presented. The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £1,947.00. | Upheld | — | £1,947 |
| Breach of contract | Rule 21 judgment; no response was presented. The tribunal found dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered payment of net damages of £990.00. | Upheld | — | £990 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,937
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.