Case 4100542/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Findlay & Others v Addresses as per schedule Represented by Mr R Ryan (Barrister) Mr F Reburn In Person Seahorse Maritime Limited (in liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 4100542/2020
- Decision date
- 12 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Smith
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Findlay & Others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that all of the claimants were employees of Seahorse Maritime Limited (in liquidation) and that they were dismissed by reason of redundancy. On that basis, the tribunal found that each claimant was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment.
The judgment then set out the amounts due to each claimant individually: Mr R Findlay £6,096; Mr A Fraser £6,350; Mr B Macdonald £8,636.10; Mr P Moore £4,752; Mr I Rutherford £9,144; and Mr F Reburn £14,372. No separate breakdown of the awards was provided beyond those statutory redundancy payment figures.
The reasons section states that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. No additional legal test, factual dispute, or alternative claim outcome is set out in the written judgment text supplied.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Mr R Findlay (4100542/20); statutory redundancy payment awarded. | Upheld | — | £6,096 |
| Redundancy | Mr A Fraser (4100551/20); statutory redundancy payment awarded. | Upheld | — | £6,350 |
| Redundancy | Mr B Macdonald (4101270/20); statutory redundancy payment awarded. | Upheld | — | £8,636 |
| Redundancy | Mr P Moore (4101271/20); statutory redundancy payment awarded. | Upheld | — | £4,752 |
| Redundancy | Mr I Rutherford (4101272/20); statutory redundancy payment awarded. | Upheld | — | £9,144 |
| Redundancy | Mr F Reburn (4101469/20); statutory redundancy payment awarded. | Upheld | — | £14,372 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £49,350
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.