Case 4100543/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms E Jamieson v Ms D Watson t/a Helena Beauty — 2020
- Case reference
- 4100543/2020
- Decision date
- 27 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Gall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms E Jamieson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant and respondent both appeared in person at a CVP hearing before Employment Judge R Gall on 27 July 2020. The respondent accepted before and at the hearing that £262.72 was due to the claimant for two weeks' notice pay, calculated from a weekly rate of £131.36. The tribunal noted that no contract or written agreement authorising any deduction from that sum had been produced, and that no employer contract claim had been presented.
The only factual dispute raised concerned whether two days, 10 August 2019 and 15 December 2019, had been taken as holiday. That issue mattered because the respondent said it had overpaid holiday and wanted to set any alleged overpayment off against the notice-pay sum. The claimant then said she did not wish to insist on the holiday-pay claim, and the tribunal recorded that the claim for holiday pay accrued but untaken at termination was withdrawn, not dismissed.
The tribunal therefore ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £262.72. It also stated that if the respondent wished to pursue repayment of any alleged overpayment, it would need to do so separately, and that the claimant would remain able to defend any such claim and, if necessary, pursue the holiday-pay sum she had sought in this case.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The respondent accepted before and at the hearing that £262.72 was due as two weeks' notice pay, calculated from a weekly rate of £131.36; no contract or written agreement authorising deductions was produced. | Upheld | — | £263 |
| Holiday pay | The claimant said she did not wish to insist on the holiday pay claim for leave accrued but untaken at termination. The tribunal recorded that the claim was withdrawn and not dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £263
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.