Case 4100577/2017 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100577/2017 Employment Judge W A Meiklejohn Mr S Hope v HS Realisations Limited (Formerly Hewden Stuart Ltd) — 2019
- Case reference
- 4100577/2017
- Decision date
- 3 May 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sandy Meiklejohn
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100577/2017 Employment Judge W A Meiklejohn Mr S Hope
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, on the ground that it had not been actively pursued under rule 37(1)(d).
The Tribunal had given the claimant an opportunity on 10 April 2019 to provide written reasons by 24 April 2019, or to request a hearing, to address why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason why judgment should not be made and did not request a hearing. The claim was therefore struck out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that the claim was struck out under rule 37 because it had not been actively pursued. The extracted judgment text does not specify the substantive claim or claims adjudicated. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.