Case 4100580/2016 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100580/2016 & 4103974/2016 Mr J Allan v Scottish Qualifications Authority — 2017
- Case reference
- 4100580/2016
- Decision date
- 16 March 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100580/2016 & 4103974/2016 Mr J Allan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claims in cases 4100580/2016 and 4103974/2016 were withdrawn by Mr J Allan. Employment Judge Frances Eccles therefore dismissed the claims under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 on 16 March 2017.
The judgment contains no findings on the merits and records no monetary award or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed-term employee regulations | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim in the text provided; this claim type is inferred from the case listing. The judgment states that the claims were withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim in the text provided; this claim type is inferred from the case listing. The judgment states that the claims were withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.