Case 4100585/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Nolan Miralles v Bibi’s East Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 4100585/2025
- Decision date
- 21 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge D Hoey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Nolan Miralles
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim. The Employment Judge therefore issued judgment under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the available material.
On that material, the tribunal held that Bibi’s East Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr A Nolan Miralles’s wages. It ordered the respondent to pay £167.48 gross, described in the judgment as 14.5 hours at £11.55 per hour.
The tribunal also held that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £23.10 gross in respect of that claim. The judgment records no separate award for interest or any other remedy beyond those two gross sums.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £167.48, calculated as 14.5 hours x £11.55. | Upheld | — | £167 |
| Working time regulations | The tribunal found that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum of £23.10. | Upheld | — | £23 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £191
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.