Case 4100592/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Member Ms Z van Zwanenberg Tribunal Member Mr D Frew Mr P Rzepka v Amazon UK Services Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 4100592/2020
- Decision date
- 30 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jones
- Venue
- Edinburgh
- Panel members
- Ms Z van Zwanenberg, Mr D Frew
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Member Ms Z van Zwanenberg Tribunal Member Mr D Frew Mr P Rzepka
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was dismissed following an allegation that he had made threatening comments about a supervisor. The tribunal found that he had not threatened to slap the supervisor or break her legs, although he had made negative comments about her and her management. It found that the alleged race-related comment by the supervisor, described by the claimant as calling him a "lazy Polish shit", was not proved, and the race discrimination claim failed.
For unfair dismissal, the tribunal accepted conduct as a potentially fair reason but found the investigation was outside the band of reasonable responses. It found that questioning was directed towards confirming the allegation rather than establishing the facts, that the claimant's allegations about Mr Walker were not investigated, and that the investigation report reached conclusions going beyond the evidence.
The tribunal also found that the disciplinary decision maker did not approach the hearing with an open mind and had taken an expired warning into account when deciding both culpability and sanction. No Polkey deduction or deduction for failure to appeal was made, but the compensatory award was reduced by 20% for contributory conduct because the claimant's angry approach to Mr Walker was the initial cause of the proceedings. The wrongful dismissal claim succeeded because the claimant's conduct was not a fundamental breach of contract entitling dismissal without notice.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was wrongfully dismissed and awarded unpaid notice pay of £730.70 net. | Upheld | — | £731 |
| Race discrimination | The tribunal found there was not sufficient evidence that the claimant had been discriminated against because of race. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the dismissal unfair because the investigation and disciplinary hearing were not conducted impartially. | Upheld | — | £9,859 |
| Holiday pay | At the commencement of the hearing the claimant confirmed that he did not wish to proceed with the unpaid holiday pay claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,589
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,575
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £8,284
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
8 references- s.9 Equality Act 2010
- s.13 Equality Act 2010
- s.98(2) ERA 1996
- s.98(4) ERA 1996
- Burchell test
- Polkey v AE Dayton Services Ltd
- s.123(6) ERA 1996
- Nelson v BBC (No.2)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.