Case 4100595/2026 · Employment Tribunal

Mr R Brackenridge-Cumming v Bake Scotland Limited — 2026

Case reference: 4100595/2026
Decision date: 12 June 2026
Jurisdiction: Scotland
Judge: Employment Judge A Kemp

Indexed: 14 July 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr R Brackenridge-Cumming

Respondent

Bake Scotland Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

Bake Scotland Limited presented no response to Mr R Brackenridge-Cumming's claim. Employment Judge A Kemp determined the claim on the available material under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 and found that the respondent had not paid wages owed to the claimant, contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.

The payslips lodged by the claimant showed unpaid wages for various dates between 22 September 2025 and 9 November 2025. The respondent was ordered to pay £1,927.40 gross. It may make legally required deductions for Income Tax and employee National Insurance Contributions before paying the balance, provided that any deductions are remitted to HMRC and written evidence is supplied to the claimant.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unlawful deduction from wages	The award is a gross sum. The respondent may deduct Income Tax and employee National Insurance Contributions if legally required, subject to remitting them to HMRC and providing written evidence to the claimant.	Upheld	—	£1,927

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £1,927; across all upheld claims

Legal tests applied

2 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.