Case 4100600/2021 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100600/2021 and Multiple Ref 9666 Mr C Abbot & others v Via Representative Mr T Merck Represented by: Mr T Merck - Solicitor The Chief Constable of Police Service of Scotland st — 2021
- Case reference
- 4100600/2021
- Decision date
- 17 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Joseph
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100600/2021 and Multiple Ref 9666 Mr C Abbot & others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a short disposal order. It records that the claims against the First Respondent only, the Chief Constable of Police Service of Scotland, were withdrawn by the claimants. On that basis, the tribunal dismissed those claims under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
No substantive findings of fact or liability are set out in the text provided, and no remedy was awarded. The judgment also does not record any panel members, legal tests, or a split of claims by cause of action. The judgment was dated 11 May 2021 and entered in the register on 17 May 2021.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the claims against the First Respondent only were withdrawn by the claimants and therefore dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No substantive liability finding is given. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.