Case 4100614/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G White v Plant Blonde Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 4100614/2025
- Decision date
- 25 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Doherty
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G White
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 22 judgment in which no response had been presented. Employment Judge L Doherty decided the claim on the available material and found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages. The judgment orders payment of the net sum of £1,477.10 in respect of November 2024, December 2024 and January 2025.
The judge also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement. The judgment orders payment of the gross sum of £624, described as 52 hours of accrued but untaken annual leave at a rate of £12 per hour.
No other claims, legal tests, or reasons are set out in the extracted judgment text. The bottom-line monetary awards recorded in the judgment are the two sums above, giving a total of £2,101.10.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Ordered as the net sum of £1,477.10 in respect of November 2024, December 2024 and January 2025. | Upheld | — | £1,477 |
| Holiday pay | Ordered as the gross sum of £624 for 52 hours accrued but untaken annual leave at a rate of £12 per hour. | Upheld | — | £624 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,101
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.