Case 4100615/2025 · Employment Tribunal
J James v Plant Blonde Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 4100615/2025
- Decision date
- 25 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Doherty
Parties
2 namedClaimant
J James
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and Employment Judge L Doherty issued judgment on the available material under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The tribunal found that Plant Blonde Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from J James's wages for the months of November 2024, December 2024, January 2025 and February 2025, and ordered payment of the net sum of £813.58.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of the gross sum of £594.50, which the judgment identifies as 41 hours of accrued but untaken annual leave calculated at a rate of £12.50 per hour. The judgment records no other issues, and no separate legal reasoning or cited authorities beyond rule 22.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of November 2024, December 2024, January 2025 and February 2025 and ordered payment of the net sum of £813.58. | Upheld | — | £814 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum of £594.50, described as 41 hours of accrued but untaken annual leave at £12.50 per hour. | Upheld | — | £595 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,408
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.