Case 4100616/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Cornelli v Plant Blonde Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 4100616/2025
- Decision date
- 25 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Doherty
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Cornelli
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim. Employment Judge L Doherty determined the case on the available material under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024.
The tribunal found that Plant Blonde Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr M Cornelli’s wages and ordered payment of the net sum of £3,371.57 in respect of January 2025 and February 2025.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum of £2,254.50. The figure reflected 167 hours of accrued but untaken annual leave at a rate of £13.50 per hour.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 22 judgment on the available material; respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages for January 2025 and February 2025. | Upheld | — | £3,372 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 22 judgment on the available material; respondent failed to pay holiday entitlement, assessed as 167 hours of untaken annual leave at £13.50 per hour. | Upheld | — | £2,255 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,626
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.