Case 4100618/2025 · Employment Tribunal
C May v Plant Blonde Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 4100618/2025
- Decision date
- 25 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Doherty
Parties
2 namedClaimant
C May
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and Employment Judge L Doherty issued judgment on the available material under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £3,174.94 net in respect of the months of January 2025 and February 2025.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £1,250 gross, calculated as 100 hours of accrued but untaken annual leave at a rate of £12.50 per hour.
The total award recorded by the judgment is £4,424.94.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages for January 2025 and February 2025; ordered net payment of £3,174.94. | Upheld | — | £3,175 |
| Holiday pay | Failure to pay holiday entitlement; ordered gross payment of £1,250 for 100 hours accrued but untaken annual leave at £12.50 per hour. | Upheld | — | £1,250 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,425
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.