Case 4100646/2019 · Employment Tribunal
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No 4100646/2019 Ms L MacDonald v Represented by: Mr R Russell Solicitor Angus Alive — 2019
- Case reference
- 4100646/2019
- Decision date
- 8 May 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McFatridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No 4100646/2019 Ms L MacDonald
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a short disposal order rather than a merits decision. It identifies the case as Ms L MacDonald v Angus Alive, case number 4100646/2019, and records that the claim was represented by Mr R Russell, solicitor, for Angus Alive and by Ms C Richardson, solicitor, for the respondent.
The tribunal states that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant. On that basis, it dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The judgment does not set out any findings on the substance of the underlying claim, any legal test applied to the merits, or any monetary remedy. It records Employment Judge Ian McFatridge and the date of judgment as 8 May 2019.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.