Case 4100652/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100652/2019 Mr D Watson v Healthcare Environmental Services Limited (in compulsory liquidation) — 2019
- Case reference
- 4100652/2019
- Decision date
- 3 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100652/2019 Mr D Watson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim. The Employment Judge issued judgment on the available material under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages, dismissed the claimant in breach of contract in respect of notice, and failed to pay holiday entitlement. It ordered payments of £1,535.28, £384, and £432 respectively.
The tribunal also found that the respondent failed to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant remuneration for the protected period of 90 days from 27 December 2018, without stating a monetary total in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £1,535.28. | Upheld | — | £1,535 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £384 for one week. | Upheld | — | £384 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £432. | Upheld | — | £432 |
| Trade union | The judgment states that the respondent failed to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 and ordered remuneration for a protected period of 90 days from 27 December 2018, but does not state a specific monetary figure for this award. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.