Case 4100660/2015 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Jordan v Tokheim UK Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 4100660/2015
- Decision date
- 27 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Jordan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Robert Gall, sitting in Glasgow, struck out Mr S Jordan's claim against Tokheim UK Limited under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The tribunal recorded that the claim had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d).
The reasons state that the tribunal had given the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 8 January 2021 or to request a hearing to consider why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment does not record any substantive determination on the merits and does not award a remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type. The reasons also contain an apparent date inconsistency: the opportunity to provide written reasons is stated as 18 December 2021, with a deadline of 8 January 2021. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.