Case 4100664/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4100664/2019 Ms D Faller v Glasgow City Council Culture And Sport Glasgow T/a Glasgow — 2023
- Case reference
- 4100664/2019
- Decision date
- 28 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4100664/2019 Ms D Faller
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Ms D Faller's claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 because it had not been actively pursued. The reasons recorded that her solicitors had withdrawn, that a status enquiry letter asking for confirmation of her intention had not been answered, and that a strike-out warning letter was then sent on 12 June 2023 by direction of an Employment Judge.
The tribunal said the warning correspondence was returned to the office marked that the claimant no longer lived at the address given on the ET1. No steps were taken to notify the tribunal of any new address, so the tribunal could not communicate with her and could not give her notice under rule 37(2). In those circumstances it assumed she no longer wished to pursue the claim and ordered that it be struck out under rule 37(1)(d). The judgment is dated 28 June 2023 and is signed by Employment Judge Frances Eccles.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment text does not identify the substantive jurisdiction or statutory claim type; it records only that the claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37(1)(d) Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- rule 37(2) Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.