Case 4100668/2015 · Employment Tribunal
Ms E Welsh v Tokheim UK Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 4100668/2015
- Decision date
- 1 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms E Welsh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Glasgow before Employment Judge Robert Gall, the tribunal on 1 December 2020 struck out Ms E Welsh's claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 because it had not been actively pursued. The tribunal recorded that on 2 November 2020 it had given the claimant until 16 November 2020 either to provide written reasons why strike-out should not be ordered or to request a hearing on that question.
The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment records no liability findings on the underlying issues and no monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.