Case 4100690/2020 · Employment Tribunal
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100690/2020 Mr K Ritchie v Limited (in Liquidation) — 2020
- Case reference
- 4100690/2020
- Decision date
- 6 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100690/2020 Mr K Ritchie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mr K Ritchie was the claimant and John Graham (Metals) Limited was the respondent. The claimant was represented by Mr W McParland, solicitor, and the respondent by Ms L MacDonald, solicitor.
The Employment Judge stated that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant. It was therefore dismissed under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No findings on the merits or remedy were recorded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim type follows the gov.uk listing category; the judgment itself does not set out the individual causes of action and states only that the claim was withdrawn and dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Claim type follows the gov.uk listing category; the judgment itself does not set out the individual causes of action and states only that the claim was withdrawn and dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Claim type follows the gov.uk listing category; the judgment itself does not set out the individual causes of action and states only that the claim was withdrawn and dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.