Case 4100694/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Lulkowski v The Manna House Bakery — 2020
- Case reference
- 4100694/2020
- Decision date
- 9 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Lulkowski
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was determined under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 because no response had been presented. Employment Judge F Eccles decided the case on the available material and issued judgment without a contested hearing.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's claim for an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered The Manna House Bakery to pay £440. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £440 for that claim.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,144. The judgment records no separate explanation of the calculation of the three sums beyond the findings set out in the dispositive paragraphs.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £440 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £440 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,144 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,024
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.