Case 4100703/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100703/2019 Mr K Mirzaie v Fryer Tucks (Scotland) Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4100703/2019
- Decision date
- 28 March 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Muriel Robison
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100703/2019 Mr K Mirzaie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Muriel Robison recorded that the claimant, Mr K Mirzaie, had succeeded in his complaints of failure to pay holiday pay and outstanding arrears of pay against Fryer Tucks (Scotland) Limited. The judgment does not set out a detailed liability analysis; it simply records that those complaints succeeded. The hearing fixed for 18 April 2019 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment records that the claimant's complaint of failure to pay holiday pay succeeded under Rule 21. No separate sum was allocated to this claim in the judgment; the award is stated as a single total together with the arrears of pay complaint. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the claimant's complaint of outstanding arrears of pay succeeded under Rule 21. No separate sum was allocated to this claim in the judgment; the award is stated as a single total together with the holiday pay complaint. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,333
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.