Case 4100704/2020 · Employment Tribunal
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100704/2020 Miss J Montgomery v Represent by: Ms A Grdon Solicitor Alliance Trust Savings Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 4100704/2020
- Decision date
- 2 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McFatridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100704/2020 Miss J Montgomery
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Ian McFatridge issued this judgment in Scotland on 1 June 2020 and sent it to the parties on 2 June 2020. The judgment records only that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant.
Because the claim was withdrawn, the tribunal dismissed it under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No substantive findings on liability, no legal reasoning on the merits, and no remedy award are recorded in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The extracted text does not identify the underlying claim type(s) beyond the case listing. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.