Case 4100710/2025 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100710/2025 Held in Edinburgh on April 2026 Employment Judge M A Macleod Mrs M Boyle v Royal Mutual Insurance Society Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 4100710/2025
- Decision date
- 14 May 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maclean. In
- Venue
- Edinburgh
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100710/2025 Held in Edinburgh on April 2026 Employment Judge M A Macleod Mrs M Boyle
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe underlying proceedings began with Mrs Boyle's sex discrimination complaint, and an earlier amendment adding disability discrimination claims had been granted. The further amendment, initially submitted on 8 December 2025 and particularised on 16 January 2026, proposed allegations concerning discrimination arising from disability, reasonable adjustments, direct sex discrimination, victimisation, performance processes and grievance procedures.
Applying the amendment factors in Selkent Bus Co Ltd v Moore, the Tribunal found that the proposed amendment was relatively significant, introduced new facts, partly covered matters already pleaded and lacked specification and detail. The respondent did not contend that the new allegations were time-barred. Having considered the claimant's previous opportunities to amend, the work already undertaken to define the claims, the interests of both parties and the overriding objective, the Tribunal concluded that allowing another amendment would cause further delay and would be disproportionate. The amendment application was therefore refused.
The Tribunal also directed that case 4100710/2025 should not be combined with Mrs Boyle's separate claim, case 8000498/2026, because combination was likely to cause significant and unnecessary delay. The merits of the sex discrimination, disability discrimination and victimisation allegations were not determined, and the judgment records no monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Procedural judgment refusing the claimant's application to amend and directing that these proceedings should not be combined with case 8000498/2026. No substantive discrimination claim was determined. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Selkent Bus Co Ltd v Moore 1996 ICR 836 amendment factors
- overriding objective of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.