Case 4100725/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms P Nelson v Watt Brothers (Glasgow And Edinburgh) Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 4100725/2020
- Decision date
- 1 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms P Nelson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and the Employment Judge issued judgment under Rule 21 on the available material. The tribunal found the claim well founded.
The tribunal held that the respondent was under a duty to consult about dismissals under section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 and failed to do so. It therefore made a protective award in respect of all employees made redundant by the respondent and listed on the attached schedule.
The protected period was stated to begin on 22 November 2019 and to last for 90 days. The extracted text does not state a separate monetary figure for this case, but it records that the respondent was ordered to pay remuneration for the protected period.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award under section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The judgment was issued under Rule 21 with no response presented. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.