Case 4100770/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100770/2019 Mr L Kuskulic v Vimo Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4100770/2019
- Decision date
- 21 March 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laura Doherty
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100770/2019 Mr L Kuskulic
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was dealt with under rule 21 because no response had been presented. On the available material, Employment Judge Laura Doherty found that Vimo Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr L Kuskulic's wages and ordered payment of £8.50.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £232.90. In addition, it found that the respondent had failed to issue a statement of employment particulars as required by section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and made an award of £391 under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £9 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £233 |
| Other | Failure to issue a statement of employment particulars under section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996; award made under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | £391 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £632
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.