Case 4100771/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Michaud v Asam — 2017
- Case reference
- 4100771/2017
- Decision date
- 26 June 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Michaud
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued because the respondent presented no response to the claim. On the available material, Employment Judge Frances Eccles found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from Mrs M Michaud's wages. The tribunal therefore ordered the respondent to pay £279 in respect of the deduction.
The judgment also ordered the respondent to pay the claimant's tribunal fee of £160. The hearing listed for 27 July 2017 was cancelled. No other claims, findings, or legal tests were set out in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment on the available material. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £279. The respondent was also ordered to reimburse the claimant's tribunal fee of £160. | Upheld | — | £279 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £439
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £279
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.