Case 4100797/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Scott v Invotech Electrical Services Limited — 2017
- Case reference
- 4100797/2017
- Decision date
- 4 July 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Scott
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment made on the papers because the respondent presented no response. On the available material, Employment Judge Frances Eccles found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages, that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, and that he was dismissed by reason of redundancy.
The tribunal therefore ordered payment of £2,518.75 for the wage deduction, £4,650 in notice pay damages, and £5,748 as a redundancy payment. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,162.50.
In addition, the respondent was ordered to reimburse the claimant's tribunal fee of £160. The listed hearing on 2 August 2017 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £2,519 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay damages, calculated as 8 weeks x £581.25. | Upheld | — | £4,650 |
| Redundancy | Redundancy payment, calculated as 12 weeks x £479. | Upheld | — | £5,748 |
| Holiday pay | Failure to pay holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £1,163 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,239
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.