Case 4100805/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Soana Ltd and Verified Group Glasgow Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 4100805/2022
- Decision date
- 13 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tinnion
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a CVP hearing on 12 April 2022 before Employment Judge Tinnion, the tribunal recorded by consent that the First Respondent's name was to be changed to Soana Limited. The tribunal then determined three claims arising from the Claimant's employment-related payments.
The Claimant's holiday pay claim against the First Respondent succeeded. The judgment states that the claim was well founded under the Working Time Regulations 1998 and s.13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and awards £492.80, described as 7 x £70.40.
The Claimant's wages claim against the Second Respondent also succeeded. The tribunal found that claim well founded under s.13 ERA 1996 and ordered payment of £565, calculated by subtracting £750 already paid from a wage entitlement of £1,315. The Claimant's commission claim against the Second Respondent was dismissed on withdrawal under Rule 52. The awards made on the upheld claims total £1,057.80.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The Claimant's holiday pay claim against the First Respondent under the Working Time Regulations 1998 and s.13 ERA 1996 was found well founded. The First Respondent was ordered to pay £492.80, calculated as 7 x £70.40. | Upheld | — | £493 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Claimant's wages claim against the Second Respondent under s.13 ERA 1996 was found well founded. The Second Respondent was ordered to pay £565, representing £1,315 wage entitlement less £750 already paid. | Upheld | — | £565 |
| Other | The Claimant's commission claim against the Second Respondent was dismissed on withdrawal under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,058
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.