Case 4100823/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100823/2022 Mr A Black v Verified Group Glasgow Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 4100823/2022
- Decision date
- 20 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Muriel Robison
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100823/2022 Mr A Black
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was determined under rule 21 on the available material because no response had been presented. Employment Judge Muriel Robison recorded that the respondent had not responded to the claim before issuing judgment.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's claim for unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered the respondent to pay £1,666.15 net. It also upheld the claim for breach of contract in respect of notice, finding that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract and awarding £323.08 net in damages.
A further claim for unpaid holiday entitlement was upheld, with the tribunal ordering payment of £472.50 gross. The combined monetary award recorded in the judgment was £2,461.73.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £1,666.15 net. | Upheld | — | £1,666 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £323.08 net. | Upheld | — | £323 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £472.50 gross. | Upheld | — | £473 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,462
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.