Case 4100826/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Cook v Tesco Stores Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 4100826/2022
- Decision date
- 19 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge J McCluskey
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Cook
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was employed as a Warehouse Team Manager and resigned on 25 September 2021, giving four weeks' notice. His employment terminated on 22 October 2021. He lodged a grievance on the same date as his resignation and received the grievance outcome on 7 December 2021. He presented his ET1 on 28 January 2022, after contacting Acas on 23 January 2022.
The tribunal found that the last day for lodging the claim was 21 January 2022. Because early conciliation did not begin until 23 January 2022, the statutory extension provisions did not stop time before the limitation period expired. The claim was therefore not presented within the prescribed time limit.
The tribunal accepted that the claimant said he did not know about the time limit until Acas told him, and that he had thought he could not lodge a claim while his grievance was ongoing. It found, however, that he had access to a trade union representative, the CAB and internet research, and that he had not made enquiries until very late. It concluded that it was reasonably practicable for him to have lodged the claim in time and that his ignorance of the time limit was not reasonable. The tribunal therefore held that it had no jurisdiction to consider the complaint.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal determined as a preliminary issue that the claim was lodged out of time and that it had no jurisdiction under section 111 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 to hear the complaint of constructive unfair dismissal. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- section 111 ERA 1996
- section 111(2)(b) ERA 1996
- section 207B(3) ERA 1996
- Porter v Bandridge Ltd
- Marks & Spencer Plc v Williams-Ryan
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.