Case 4100836/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Wightman v Stockbridge Decorators Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 4100836/2022
- Decision date
- 4 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Sutherland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Wightman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Colin Wightman, worked for Stockbridge Decorators Ltd as a painter and decorator from 14 June 2021 to 29 October 2021. He was told he would work 38 hours a week, be paid £16 an hour, and receive time and a half for overtime. His gross weekly wage was £608, paid weekly in arrears as £488.48 net. The respondent did not appear at the hearing. The tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence on the balance of probabilities and said there was no reason to doubt his credibility or reliability.
On unlawful deductions from wages, the tribunal found that the claimant was due £608 gross for the last week of employment and £168 gross for 7 hours of overtime worked in the final two weeks. Those sums had not been paid, so the tribunal upheld the claim and found an unlawful deduction of £776 gross, from which tax and national insurance were to be deducted.
On holiday pay, the tribunal found that the holiday year ran from the start of employment on 14 June 2021. By the termination date on 29 October 2021 the claimant had accrued 10.6 days' holiday, had taken 2 days, and was entitled to payment in lieu for the remaining 8.6 days. The tribunal therefore awarded £1,045 gross.
On the failure to issue written terms and conditions, the tribunal found that the claimant had not been given any written statement of his employment particulars despite requesting one on several occasions. Having regard to the small size of the employer and the short duration of employment, the tribunal considered it just and equitable to award two weeks' pay, subject to the statutory cap, in the sum of £1,088.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal found that no written statement of employment particulars or terms and conditions had been provided despite repeated requests and awarded two weeks' pay under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002, subject to the statutory cap. | Upheld | — | £1,088 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant had not been paid his final week's wages of £608 gross and 7 hours' overtime of £168 gross, making an unlawful deduction of £776 gross. | Upheld | — | £776 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the claimant had accrued 10.6 days' holiday by 29 October 2021, had taken 2 days, and was therefore entitled to payment in lieu for 8.6 days, assessed at £1,045 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,045 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,909
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
7 references- balance of probabilities
- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.13(3) ERA 1996
- Regulations 13 and 13A Working Time Regulations 1998
- Regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1998
- s.1 ERA 1996
- s.38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.