Case 4100837/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L McCulloch Hood v Limited (in Liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 4100837/2025
- Decision date
- 12 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Shepherd
- Venue
- Dundee
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L McCulloch Hood
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal gave oral reasons at the hearing in accordance with rule 60(3) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024.
The claim for constructive unfair dismissal was found not well founded and was dismissed. The breach of contract claim in respect of notice pay was also found not well founded and dismissed.
Because the constructive unfair dismissal and breach of contract claims were dismissed, the Tribunal made no award under s.38 Employment Act 2002 in respect of the failure to give a statement of employment particulars.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment describes this as a claim for constructive unfair dismissal and states it was not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The breach of contract claim was in respect of notice pay and was not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £0
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.