Case 4100848/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Davidson v – Counsel The Secretary of State for Business — 2022
- Case reference
- 4100848/2022
- Decision date
- 13 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Neilson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Davidson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr D Davidson was the sole shareholder and a director of D2 Contracting Ltd, but he personally carried out the company’s quality assurance work for clients from 2015 to 2021. The tribunal, applying Ready Mixed Concrete and the guidance in Neufeld, held that ownership and directorship did not prevent him from also being an employee for ERA purposes. It found that there was a contract of employment and that he could be paid both salary and dividends.
On pay, the tribunal rejected the claimant’s case that he worked an average 48-hour week at National Minimum Wage rates. It found there was no reliable time-record evidence and preferred the HMRC and payslip evidence showing annual salary figures of £11,499, £11,850, £9,999 and £9,767, with a weekly pay figure of £187.82 at 31 March 2021. On that basis, the claim for arrears of pay failed because the tribunal found no reliable evidence of unpaid arrears.
Using the accepted weekly pay, the tribunal awarded statutory redundancy pay of £1,126.92 under section 166 ERA 1996. It also awarded balance of notice pay of £984.63 and accrued leave of £37.56, the latter two sums being subject to deduction of appropriate tax and National Insurance. The holiday element was limited to 0.54 days under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998; the broader carry-forward argument under regulation 13(10) failed because the tribunal was not satisfied that coronavirus made it not reasonably practicable for the claimant to take the leave.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment under s.166 ERA 1996; tribunal used weekly pay of £187.82, six years' service and age 31. | Upheld | — | £1,127 |
| Other | Statutory notice pay under s.182 ERA 1996; tribunal accepted six weeks' notice and deducted £142.29. | Upheld | — | £985 |
| Holiday pay | Accrued leave on termination under reg.14 WTR; tribunal rejected the wider carry-forward case under reg.13(10) WTR. | Upheld | — | £38 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for arrears of pay based on an alleged 48-hour week and NMW shortfall; tribunal found no reliable evidence of hours or arrears. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,149
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
6 references- Ready Mixed Concrete threefold test
- Neufeld
- s.230 ERA 1996
- s.221 ERA 1996 weeks' pay
- regulation 13(10) WTR
- regulation 14 WTR
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.