Case 4100861/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Frew v Core Plant Hire Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 4100861/2022
- Decision date
- 21 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Beyzade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Frew
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a consent judgment issued by Employment Judge B Beyzade on 19 April 2022 in case 4100861/2022. The judgment records that the parties agreed that the respondent, Core Plant Hire Ltd, would pay Mr A Frew £2,000 net by no later than 4pm on 21 April 2022 in settlement of his unlawful deduction of wages claim, identified in the order as holiday pay for the period 29 July 2020 to 10 November 2021.
The judgment also records a separate agreed term that the respondent would provide the claimant with all wage slips for the tax year 2021/2022 in electronic form by no later than 4pm on 3 May 2022. No substantive findings on liability were issued beyond the consent order, and the judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note at the end of the order.
The tribunal made no order as to expenses, wasted costs or preparation time. The only monetary sum recorded in the judgment is the £2,000 net payment, which is the bottom-line figure reflected in the consent order.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | By consent, the respondent agreed to pay compensation for the unlawful deduction of wages claim, described in the judgment as holiday pay, covering 29 July 2020 to 10 November 2021. | Settled | — | £2,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.