Case 4100882/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss H Liblik v Taam Hotel Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 4100882/2020
- Decision date
- 12 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Sangster
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss H Liblik
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing was conducted via Cloud Video Platform on 12 November 2020 before Employment Judge M Sangster. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was not represented. The tribunal gave oral reasons at the hearing and recorded awards on three substantive claims, with the remaining claims dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The extracted judgment only says the claimant's remaining claims are dismissed and does not identify this claim separately; included from the case listing context. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,877 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded in respect of holidays accrued but untaken on termination of employment. | Upheld | — | £1,386 |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,314 |
| Other | The extracted judgment only says the claimant's remaining claims are dismissed and does not identify this claim separately; included from the case listing context. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,576
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,314
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.