Case 4100925/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Downie & Mr M Davidson v Urquhart and Co (PHE) Ltd CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 In accordance with the power set out in — 2019
- Case reference
- 4100925/2019
- Decision date
- 18 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Claire McManus
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Downie & Mr M Davidson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningA certificate of correction dated 18 December 2019 records that the judgment sent to the parties on 18 November 2019 contained a clerical error in the case numbers. It deletes 4100925/2019 & 4100926/2019 and substitutes 4100761/2019 & 4100762/2019, and notes that the amended judgment is attached.
The underlying judgment, dated 1 November 2019, states that the claims had been withdrawn by the claimants. On that basis, the tribunal dismissed the claims under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. No monetary award is recorded in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment text does not identify the substantive claim type. It states that the claims had been withdrawn by the claimants and were dismissed under Rule 52. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The extracted judgment text does not identify the substantive claim type. It states that the claims had been withdrawn by the claimants and were dismissed under Rule 52. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.