Case 4100939/2026 · Employment Tribunal
S MacKay v Theo Health Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 4100939/2026
- Decision date
- 10 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge P O’Donnell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
S MacKay
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response to S MacKay’s claim had been presented. Employment Judge P O’Donnell issued judgment on the available material under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The tribunal found that Theo Health Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £19,321.93 gross for the period recorded as 'November 25 – 19 May 2026'.
The tribunal also found that Theo Health Limited had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £1,436.39 gross for 10.67 days. The two gross awards total £20,758.32, calculated by adding the separately stated amounts.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Gross award for the period recorded as 'November 25 – 19 May 2026'. | Upheld | — | £19,322 |
| Holiday pay | Gross award for holiday entitlement recorded as '10,67 days'. | Upheld | — | £1,436 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £20,758
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.