Case 4100941/2013 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Mason v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 4100941/2013
- Decision date
- 2 May 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr C Mason
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 2 May 2019 Employment Judge Frances Eccles struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, on the basis that it had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d). The claimant, Mr C Mason, was not represented. Falkirk Community Trust was represented by Clyde & Co.
The reasons record that at a hearing on 17 January 2019 the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 24 January 2019 or to request a hearing to consider why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason why the judgment should not be made and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. No liability finding or remedy award was made in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not state the underlying claim type. The public listing for the case is tagged as Equal Pay Act, but the judgment text itself only records that 'the claim' was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.